File
162338593239.jpg
- (116.35KB
, 1080x1179
, 8B26A780_7C5A_425A_9AB6_3DD1D9D73BAF.jpg
)
What is it about shotacon that gets people so obnoxiously picky about realism?
I mean seriously.
Shotas being situational masters?
"That ruins it."
Shotas having relatively "large" dicks?
"That ruins it"
Shotas making sexual fluids?
"That ruins it."
(Even though ironically,it's the most realistic thing ever.)
Yet, in any other hentai fetish, lolis dominate and squirt on grown men, human bodies are caved out by tentacles and still survive, furries, mpreg, MILFs with youthful bodies still.
These fetishes can go all out and never be harshly condemned for not confirming to reality.
Yet,shotacon is somehow an exception.
Shotas have to be shy,passive limp-wristed ragdolls to whatever fate awaits them.
Because it's "realistic".
(Even though in reality, children aren't all passive/innocent.)
Message too long. Click here to view the full text.
9
posts
and 1
image
omitted. Click Reply to view.