File
162338593239.jpg
- (116.35KB
, 1080x1179
, 8B26A780_7C5A_425A_9AB6_3DD1D9D73BAF.jpg
)
What is it about shotacon that gets people so obnoxiously picky about realism?
I mean seriously.
Shotas being situational masters?
"That ruins it."
Shotas having relatively "large" dicks?
"That ruins it"
Shotas making sexual fluids?
"That ruins it."
(Even though ironically,it's the most realistic thing ever.)
Yet, in any other hentai fetish, lolis dominate and squirt on grown men, human bodies are caved out by tentacles and still survive, furries, mpreg, MILFs with youthful bodies still.
These fetishes can go all out and never be harshly condemned for not confirming to reality.
Yet,shotacon is somehow an exception.
Shotas have to be shy,passive limp-wristed ragdolls to whatever fate awaits them.
Because it's "realistic".
(Even though in reality, children aren't all passive/innocent.)
Shotadom is seen as narcissistic/sociopathic, yet rough femdom is seen as a-OK?
Hell, in classic shotacon, shotas are often rape victims of fat old otakus.
Although there's some backlash against that, nowhere near as bad as shotadom.