>>
File
174033635780.jpg
- (108.16KB
, 1080x1080
, fullbatteris_1733008120506.jpg
)
>>16039
>have to do all of this with love, real love, but detached masculine love
My brother in Christ, you don't have to do anything. There are no shoulds. But, yes, there are different kinds of love.
The one that you're talking about here as in the detached masculine love. We are nowhere near on that level. Let's start with brotherly love. There is a progression to things. And you cannot really skip steps. Not really. And at the end of the day, everything centers around the heart.
>im an effeminate pussy who wants to be carried down the mountain by a lil bro type love
Yeah, sure, that's effeminate, I can see that, when I look deeper, BUT, if our relationships were elevated to that level, we would be a completely different civilization. Right now Earth is mostly operating on the third density. Solar plexus. Ownership. The fun - hasn't even begun yet. Hasn't even started at all yet. And I'm not talking just about romantic relationships, these are just following the general trends. You can make a sexual relationship work on the 3rd density, but don't confuse that as being above the heart, fourth density.
To me, brotherly love, which I haven't really experienced that much of, only tastes here and there, to me that is a thing of tremendous value and at the end of the day probably the highest value in terms of any kind of relationship imaginable. Yes, once that is established it can evolve for a lack of a better word, but really just as a natural progression develop into more sophisticated forms of it. But it all starts and it all ends with the heart connection. At least as far as relationships go. And in a sense, everything is a relationship. Mark my words, there is no ecstasy, there is no creative trance, which is the fifth density, there is none of that without the heart connection.
The bro relationship even in the romantic context is actually the next step after the child relationship. Which is perhaps more accurately called - charity relationship. You are as a man essentially running a charity. Owning a child.
>this is not something that women will fin pallatable
Oh they WILL fin it palatable. First of all you're doing the thinking for them here and saying stfu right now and pay attention to what I'm doing. Second they're lost little imbeciles who don't know what the fuck they want, so you can be sure as hell they won't want anything above third density. Which you're not offering in that scenario so each side wins. Third - they'll melt like butter once you start communicating directly with their body and circumventing whatever rules and regulations they think they have for the men in their lives. Body to body communication alone will do everything for you as long as you know how not to interfere with what your own body wants to do. Eye contact will only help in this because you get in contact with something more genuine than whatever bullshit usually goes on in her head, which will make it much more plausible for you to actually like her and for her in turn - it will solidify your dominance, because she doesn't know what the fuck she's doing when she's looking into your eyes, while you know exactly what you're doing.
>You want women to be more like men in regard to how they can feel detached from relationships, whether they be sexual or otherwise, and you do not seem to understand properly that women are biologically and psychologically incapable to be detached from relationships this way
I'm not building a long-term relationship here. JUST the authentic encouter, idc what she thinks about it afterwards. While it's happening, she'll have no time to think, because I'm leading the thought process there and in my head fucking wind is howling. And even if she is in her head to an extent - cool, fine, something more significant is happening though, so I'd hope she'd be paying at least some attention, otherwise it's boring - TO ME, there needs to be a mutual acknowledgement of what is happening for it to work. All I want from her is to pay attention, as long as she does - idc what fantasy she's playing in her rational mind if she has time for that. The relationship is HERE NOW bitch, PAY ATTENTION.
>involved in the things you want them to be detached in. The only women who are detached in these ways are not the beautiful people like you, they are the ones who are falling all over themselves by trying to act masculine by being loose or in some cases just trying to have male friendships
You misunderstand me. I don't want them to be detached from that part, I just don't want them to think too much about it at that moment and allow the her body itself to receive all of that relationship/fantasy whatever you want to call it - directly from my body and she CAN if I'm genuinely in love.
Also let's be real none of them are realistically looking for masculine type heart based friendship (not even men are looking for that in their friendships, not really, not yet) in their romantic relationships unless as an afterthought and even that in rare cases like if they marry a guy and are extremely evolved in general.
But yeah, the ran through and the masculinized feminist fypes or girl's girls, what I'm talking about wouldn't even be possible with them, because 1. Id probably never be attracted in the first place 2. She has no conception of such sex/play nor ability to pay attention to it or even register it on her radar. To her sex is basically what you see in porn - beyond boring. I'm glad she can still manage to get wet with that kind of sexual play, but idk, god bless both parties who enjoys that sex, yeah, God bless.
>Women do not have friendships with men,
Ok, finally we're agreeing. That's definitely not what they're looking for in their conscious mind, definitely not in the romantic context on this planet at this time.
>EVER, that is a cardinal no no that runs against their hardwired programming and you do not seem to accept that yet either.
Well, not 100% agreeing. Because, ultimately, even biologically if you pay close attention - we are the same kind of being. But forget the biologic thing that is going to take too long to discuss. But fundamentally we are exactly the same, there are no two types of beings, masculine and feminine. We are all exactly the same, we are made out of exactly the same stuff. And that alone makes the statement obsolete. You could make an argument in romantic relationships, but even that - it has an open end and when you look carefully where it leads - it leads right back to it - basic relationship between one being and another being. Basic friendship relationship. Basic love. Basic creative instinct. Basic curiosity.
But man, you wrote a book and I already wrote the book just trying to address the first points. I may or may not be able to read and address it all in a rapid succession right now. But I do find that a conversation worth having. Give me some time.