21/37

Just like highschool...

By the way, I clicked randomly because I forgot what it was out of and got the same score... are you sure this things is legit?

24/37 C14F9AA88G1F064DB26 although i thought i did a little better it was a fun test though

30
4C8A806EEG1F61CF026

I... honestly thought I'd get better than 80%.
But hey, some of those things I haven't studied yet, so I don't care that much.

23 out of 37 (62%).

Code: A641A2A87G1ED350B4C

I did better when I guess randomly. Bullshit

C09810359G1B41D9B9F

24

D30C9EEF8G1732165C8

That was less about physics more about match names to theories. Got bored.

>>8861
That and the history of physics. This quiz does suck.

Physics? More like history, this, sage.

22/37

740F9F646G174C3CE98

I got bored around 20 something (28 maybe?) and started clicking randomly...

24/37

Not so bad, I reckon.

Yeah this is a history quiz.

23/37 and Im a biology major =)
F801AB947G10574D549

25/37

No physics education whatsoever.
I have a masters in economics though

17/37

No physics education

>>8985
PFFFT!
Biology is just applied chemistry.
Which in turn, is just applied physics.

25/37

27/37

This quiz is quite crappy though.

20/37
0DFF24874G15C24EE4D

Quiz is crap.

21

Got 20/37 by answering "false" to every question
reminds me of that one pokemon episode

26 / 37
6C0080E7AG1187DD46E

That quiz is more like a history lesson than an actual physics lesson.

5E50D7625G1AB00840D

21/37

I agree. Knowing who did what is not knowing physics. I should know, I'm an engineer and I have never even heard of most of that stuff.

How the floppy fuck...
22/37
C7FA0BD56G1CAF8F91D

13A6F41E6G1B1DDD32A 22/37 too

22/37 FC856FA06G127ADF6B3
Eh, I never really liked quantum theory..or at least, learning it. Concepts were cool

29
E8EF3173DG1968A70E1

Fucker got me on the classical harmonic oscillator. Had I known the author recognized the distinction between that and QUANTUM harmonic oscillator, and in fact followed up the CHO question with a QHO version, I would have gotten 36/37. test needs a fucking back button >_<

Also, while Einstein and did technically briefly disagree over Bohrs model of the hydrogen atom, he accepted it by the 1920s

21/37 FF0159A45G1F1ACF821

Honestly... I guessed quite a bit, especially the who did what questions...

I got 25 out of 37, but the quiz seems flawed. The Big Bang is a theory that somehow got elevated to religious dogma among many so-called “physicists,” including what’s-his-face in the wheelchair. The Universe always existed and isn’t expanding. The red shift comes from photons losing energy by bumping into particles on the way here. That explains why the red shift is the same in all directions. If there was a doppler shift from an expanding universe, we’d see one point in the sky where the shift was lowest, indicating the direction of the hypothesized origin point, and the opposite part of the sky would have the greatest shift, unless we so arrogantly think the Earth is the center of the Universe.

Also, dark matter is the epicycle of the 21st century. I’m ready to be branded a heretic now.

Photons don't lose energy by bumping into shit, retard.

>>9724
hi there troll. just pointing out that according to the actual theory space itself has been expanding since the big bang. there is no origin point like you mean, the entire universe that exists IS the origin point, but inflated to a fairly big size. hence, background radiation and doppler shift everywhere.

>>9745

Yes they do, retard.

...is this outdated? I don't recognize any of this stuff from my copy of "on floating bodies." Plus, it doesn't even mention aether.

>>9749

>The entire universe that exists IS the origin point.

Think about what you just said. If the Universe is expanding, it has to expand into space that it didn’t occupy before, and if it was infinitely small at one time, then it had to have gotten bigger from somewhere. That somewhere is the origin point.

Furthermore, your calling me a “troll” is just your refusal to admit that I’m actually a heretic. I expected that, though. I’m done with this thread for good.

>>9773
1/10

>>9773
You don't understand that absolutely everything is expanding. Imagine the universe is the surface of a balloon with little dots on it, as you blow it up, all of the dots get farther away from each other, with no single origin point. You are infact expanding yourself, as the gaps between individual molecules, atoms and subatomic particles that make you grow larger, due to the fact that space and time itself is expanding.
It's hard to get your head around, I can see why you're unwilling to beleive it.

37/37.
But fuck you, string theorists. String theory has made nothing but more string theory. They have not found any form of any sort of quantifiable answer to help with any field of science at all.

>>9807
No verification code?

Troll detected.

>>9764
Are you saying Compton scattering is the reason for the red shift of FUCKING VISIBLE LIGHT? I'd love to see you justify this absurd bullshit.

27/37
AA884321BG1375EFA41

would like to know source of the music

21/37
6F64B97D5G1486D36DE

Oh and my score of 21/37 is from someone who didn't graduate high school. =P

29 - 243113DFDG107F18DFC

Did better than I thought I would... Most of my answers were semi-educated guesses. :P

went random on everything.. got 21.. If I'd actually try.. i guess I'd go higher.. Thinking this is how many Amerifags have tests..

>>8861
This

got 25
AEEEECC39G144932926
i was actually annoyed when i had to deal with alot of names rather than physics

27 out of 35. Not bad, but not great.

>>11786
Oh, and the code: 6da4f5f1dg1a7f510ad

FB7B21DA1G19A6D3399 - 17/37
No physics education and I guessed on most of them.

shitty score of 21/37 2544F6C65G1BED416A1 :(

well, i haven't finished my Education Yet, i can Improve!

7336E8C37G1BEE393E1 23/37
guessed most of em

I played it twice and got 22, didn't realize the arrows indicate your selection, not that you're correct. Maybe 22 is too high for a derp like me.

Fuck it, it's just history anyway.

25 OUT OF 37
NOT BAD FOR A cnc MACHINIST

forgot the fucking code but 19. I knew like one of these questions

This is more of a history test rather than physics. OP is a fag.

D14F35EB7G17267CB5B

23 of thirty bitches

E08F3F21BG1D383876E

there was a good amount of guessing, most of it was a history lesson, and not part of my quantum theory class... :(

E08F3F21BG1D383876E

there was a good amount of guessing, most of it was a history lesson, and not part of my quantum theory class... :(

C864EF5A7G189D572E0
23/37
I could have done worse

21/37

Not bad, I'm quite proud to be honest.

>>13546
Agreed

6977255A5G1693EFD58
21/37

Should be more than just 50-50 answers to get a better view of one's knowledge.

EABD87FDBG1BC17717A

27/37

605983A7AG13913877C

26/37
I've never taken a physics class before, but i've just always loved the subject.
Maybe next semester i'll take one.

>>15443
But at the same time if there is 37 questions by a 50/50 chance everyone should get about 18-19 right.

So to those who managed to get under that. Good job.

ACFCC9FB3G19D377E33

31/37
C1BF1420FG19E5D371D

Some of the questions were akin trivia bullshit, nothing to with physics. Also, I have very little knowledge of string theory.

>>9724
Big Bang Fact, now.
This is the first article I could find:
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/18/science/space/detection-of-waves-in-space-buttresses-landmark-theory-of-big-bang.html?_r=0

C96364465G1453929FD

>>16731

27/37
306147D9BG1B65C7A42

22/37
8EE8216B6G15079A3BA

Physics was too advanced to be taught in my highschool.

quiz expects you to have actually read a text book at some point.

24/37
2C55CB0C8G1FA3E448E

I regret nothing.

As a physics undergrad, this quiz ironically sounds like it was written by someone who doesn't study physics but just googled a bunch of random stuff about modern physics.

30/37
567F1579EG1113B4C36

I'm happy with it. The questions seemed of incredibly random difficulty though, with some which were very easy and others which were very hard.

>>8793
26 out of 37
F88B2A54AG14241D6D2

24 out of 37
AE6037A68G172CC7FC2

>modern physics
>a quarter of the questions are about string theory or M theory, which is unconfirmed hogwash and theoretical wankery
I thought physics didn't deal with religion?

>>20527

arxiv:1002.2947

hope that helps

20 of 37. This is lame. More concerned with theories and who theorized them than actual science. Not that great.

>>21596
>More concerned with theories and who theorized them than actual science

A lot like most philosophy and science debates on the internet

25/37