>>15241
Your article shows a different weapon, though I'm sure they have been developed in a similar way: both appear to be automatic cannons ripped off from tanks or other (US Coallition) military vehicles.

They very likey do have similar specs, but I find myself wondering about the different tripods, scopes, and barrel housings. Were they originally two same-spec rifles of different manufacture, or two are they distinct weapons?

>>15245
>didn't realize it'd be the other team
When it's an oppressive, game-changing technology that ensures victory regardless of the cause: the united states has been working on it for years. When it's a subversive, rule-bending technology that challenges established estimates of combat potential, the other side came up with it in the field yestderday.

>>15243
Just by size, I'd say it would make a better head or finger cannon. Tallgeese's shoulder cannon must be much larger.

>>15242
>explosive shells

This weapon must provide its user a great deal of satisfaction.