/unf/ - Uniforms

>>

Anonymous 09/11/11(Wed)04:42 No. 7722 ID: 7eb793

why don't you read the rules?

>>

30df25 09/11/12(Thu)04:46 No. 7724 ID: 30df25

File 125799756563.jpg - (67.07KB , 600x901 , Being_in_Uniform.jpg )

I didn't make a request, but I also didn't have three relevant images. I just wanted to contribute, but I shouldn't look like a leach.
Mea culpa.

>>

30df25 09/11/12(Thu)04:46 No. 7725 ID: 30df25

File 125799758431.jpg - (33.97KB , 300x397 , do_what_i_say.jpg )

>>

30df25 09/11/12(Thu)04:46 No. 7726 ID: 30df25

File 125799759535.jpg - (101.32KB , 407x600 , 0dace9c.jpg )

>>

30df25 09/11/12(Thu)04:46 No. 7727 ID: 30df25

File 125799761061.jpg - (168.59KB , 1329x1007 , Man_in_a_uniform.jpg )

>>

30df25 09/11/12(Thu)04:47 No. 7728 ID: 30df25

File 125799763230.jpg - (81.33KB , 333x500 , Patriot.jpg )

>>

30df25 09/11/12(Thu)04:47 No. 7729 ID: 30df25

File 125799766025.jpg - (82.49KB , 600x800 , Give_me_danger_little_stranger.jpg )

>>

30df25 09/11/12(Thu)04:48 No. 7730 ID: 30df25

File 125799771384.jpg - (218.77KB , 825x1050 , KriegsMadchen.jpg )

Would it have been better if I bumped the USSR thread with non-Russian uniforms instead of starting a new thread without the obligatory three pictures?

>>

Anonymous 09/11/12(Thu)06:09 No. 7732 ID: 7eb793

ideally we would just have decent threads for all major uniforms separately. it helps to start a thread off with "seed" images obviously, otherwise it just looks like a standard request thread, you know? /unf/ can have like 100 different threads at a time or something, it's possibly that those could all be different and well stocked, etc.

>>

Anonymous 09/11/13(Fri)01:03 No. 7739 ID: 2deba4

>>7730

yes, but that way you dont get that happy feeling from starting your own thread. this should just be merged with the original thread

>>

Anonymous 10/01/24(Sun)12:48 No. 10032 ID: c259ea

File 126433373526.jpg - (11.32KB , 252x259 , 15346_1202853283931_1606567973_535780_1863252_n.jpg )

me

>>

Anonymous 10/01/25(Mon)20:46 No. 10037 ID: efbab0

>>7724
people like you are the reason we cant have nice things

>>

Anonymous 11/06/12(Sun)05:19 No. 17244 ID: 6e73c7

>>10032

definitely not a militaryfag, or you are some poor third world country whose military does shit

>>

mortal1ty 12/01/09(Mon)02:00 No. 18714 ID: d768e8

File 132607082387.png - (460.66KB , 453x720 , P1000374b.png )

me some 10 months ago

>>

Anonymous 12/01/09(Mon)19:37 No. 18727 ID: 848aa7

>>18714
Gonajacket & M85 wintercamo = the shit!

>>

mortal1ty 12/01/10(Tue)08:29 No. 18729 ID: f714e8

M91 actually, the utility belt is M85 though.

>>

Anonymous 12/01/10(Tue)19:41 No. 18730 ID: 848aa7

File 132622091518.jpg - (276.95KB , 800x600 , lumiukko.jpg )

>>18729
My bad, altough afaik the only difference between M85 and M91 wintercamo is that the latter doesn't have a zipper.

Nevertheless, it's still pretty fucking nails when compared to the '05

>>

mortal1ty 12/01/11(Wed)08:29 No. 18732 ID: f714e8

really? wasn't it the other way around, since whenever I have been provided with a snow camouflage it has been called M91 in the papers I sign, and it has always had a zipper.

and yes, M05 snow camouflage is nice, hopefully I'll get to test it some day.

>>

Anonymous 12/01/13(Fri)13:26 No. 18759 ID: 848aa7

File 132645757029.jpg - (33.36KB , 283x425 , Kersantti Spolle.jpg )

>>18732
Oh, I meant that M85 & M91 were more awesome than M05.
The previous designs are almost identical to the ones used in the continuation war, and personally I think a snowcamo comprised of white is a whole lotta more conventional than a camo that's mostly grey. Also it's easier to take a dump in the older models.

Only positive sides I can think of for M05 are POCKETS, ACTUAL POCKETS, and that it protects from moisture fairly well (until you decide to hug the ground for longer periods of time, and snow starts to melt onto it.) The elastic bands on the sleeves are a nice addition as well.

>>

Anonymous 12/01/15(Sun)19:54 No. 18764 ID: 58dfa5