/tg/ - Tabletop Games

GURPS Martial Arts - Technical Grappling - Sexual Assault Anonymous 16/09/16(Fri)12:24 No. 109910

File 147402149423.jpg - (168.14KB , 966x805 , Light.jpg )

Going to throw a "NSFW" tag here, trigger warnings ahead, as the last 2 words of the title should have suggested.

Searching around and reading January (https://warosu.org/tg/thread/29588672) and March (https://yuki.la/tg/46164372) threads from this year has got me thinking about how to do this. I'm wondering if anyone would be up for a little brainstorming without getting on an SJW high-horse about how twisted it is to explore this.

We clearly need to expand on what skills to use for various types of rape and what penalties apply depending on your or your opponent's posture.

I would suggest we approach these things separately.

For example biting can be done with DX or Brawling (Martial Arts page 115) so hitting any target with the penis is probably harder than this. I'd saw it could not default to brawling, and since hitting a target with your penis is probably harder than kicking, it should be lower than DX-2.

Page 47 of GURPS Martial Arts has rules for designing body parts which are not limbs as a Striker (Basic Set page 88) and even gives the example of "Iron Buttocks". In this case I would keep 'must be crushing' and 'can't be long' unless you're some kind of womb-stabbing tentacle monster. Cannot Parry / Limited Arc / Clumsy would normally apply too.

The main problem is this inflicts more damage than punches and kicks, which isn't realistic for a penis. Even totally rigid you're usually not going to hurt anything with it. The reason that vaginas can take damage during penis-combat is due to their vulnerability not any especial damaging aspect of the tool. Any tool of sufficient diameter or length could do equal or more likely worse.

Here's how I would go about statting this...

MALE PENIS
Striker, crushing (5 points base)
Cannot Parry -40%
Limited Arc (straight ahead) -40%
Weak -50% (basic thrust damage, no +1)
I would supplement this base -140% with multiple levels of Clumsy, giving -1 to hit per -20%. Since it is aimed from outside your usual arc of vision this makes sense for any sight-relying being to have at least one level of. People with the Blindness disadvantage can get away with that requirement.

This is not a munchkin-optimized ability. You can only use a maximum of -80% in disadvantages to reduce a 5-point striker to a minimum cost of 1 point, making it a perk. In spite of this, for human realism, I went way beyond the -80%

Realistically speaking you could also choose Damage Limitations from page 111. "No Blunt Trauma" and "No Knockback" and "No Wounding" would all make sense. But to do this you would need to design the penis as an Innate Attack, not a Striker, as these limitations are limited to IA. This is probably a good idea because you can use any modifiers with the gun symbol (page 102) and buy accuracy at +5% per +1 or inaccuracy at -5% per -1. I couldn't say what level of accuracy the normal human penis would be at.

One other thing that is good about Innate Attack is the lower damage. Instead of being obligated to do "Thrust" damage, instead you could just buy 1 level at 1D6 (doesn't go up with higher ST) and if you pick 'small piercing' you can divide that by 2.

You can even buy down the 1D6 to 1 damage (0.25 dice rule) and then piercing would reduce that to 0.5 which you round down to do 0 damage. This reflects the idea that if I jam my dick into some guy's chest over and over again it's not really going to injure him.

"a fast, blunt projectile, such as a bullet, or is sharp but too small to qualify as impaling, like a dart or a stinger" I would say dicks fit the former.

Obviously you would be buying other limitations too. B110 "Accessibility: only on women -20%" would make sense if predominantly heterosexual, or "only on men" if gay, not applicable if bi.

Although... boner-change isn't instance so a straight guy with a female fluffer could theoretically use his boner attacks against a guy, but in that case we would need a way to reflect his boner going down.

Armor Divisor would also make sense (and why it's good to design this with innate attack). The benefit here is it gives people with DR 0 a DR 1 against your attack... so damage which rips a vagina/anus could be stylized as "blunt force trauma" (only useable against people with a DR, DR 0 protects you) in the campaigns book, page 379. One will assume that the endowed DR here is flexible/tough skin.

For every 5 points of crushing stopped by the DR, the target suffers 1 damage.

One thing I don't like about Armor Divisor though is that as a "penetration modifier" (LOL) it prevents using "Contact Agent" and "Followup" which is a problem because these are probably useful to reflect pregnancy.

B379's rules on hurting yourself normally only apply with DR 3 but there can be exceptions to this. Martial Arts 71 "exotic hand strike" hurts you if ANY is present, so 1 would be enough.

You take 1 point of damage for every 5 you roll, up to a maximum of of the DR, so a max of 1 damage if you roll 5 or 6 on the 1D6 innate attack. You'd think you can't reduce 1D6 to just 1 dmg since then you could never hurt yourself, but you'd be wrong.