If you left these people isolated for such a long amount of time then they’d be no better than remote areas of sub-Saharan African today - primitive, feudalistic, and exploited by the outside world for what resources they do have by whatever group would have taken up the void left by Europeans’ absence in human development.

Also Christianity would be nothing more than a minority religion in the Middle East, with Islam being the predominant religion in the West.

>>15114
What a load of garbage.
Please explain Viking naval navigation then you stupid commie pig.

>>15121
Already covered
>appropriating culture, technology and riches from other people

>>15114
Your logic is flawed in lots of ways. If we are negating the romans from the human timeline you can kiss christianity and subsequenly islam goodbye. The void would have been filled by the Sasanids who were zoroastrian and would likely have tolerated judeism.

The Vikings may have had a little less competition in kicking ass in europe. But none of Europe would have ascended past large tribal groups constantly killing one another. The vikings didn't come into their own until everyone else around them was in utter chaos following the fall of Rome. No rome, no fall, no viking dark age dominance.
This does not take away from their trade networks, their exploration, or their seamanship. It just diminishes their comparative terror level. Everyone in pre- roman Europe was murderous blood thirsty tribal assholes, the Vikings would have been just one of many.

>french
>white
>anglo
>White
>germ
>white

>>15111
You could do that for any 'race' and they, in turn, would turn out to be nothing if not for influences outside of themselves you utter imbecile.
Also, how are you defining 'white'? If the Greeks and Romans count (which they do, skin colour is an absolutely minute characteristic) then you've just lost 80% of your argument.

>>15124
>
>Already covered
>>appropriating culture, technology and riches from other people
>
Which people, sorry?

>>15143
>implying the romans weren't bloodthirsty assholes themselves

>>15111
Supposing that's true. So fucking what?
Are you triggered because we went further beyond with it than you did? The internet, cryptography, the moon landings. All of those were done by anglos, you know.

>>15157
>cryptography
You really don't know /hi/story

>>15158
Even without that my point still stands.
Its not all about who came first. Whites invented modern cryptography.

>>15159
>modern
Yeah no that's not how inventing works.

>>15161
What on earth are you blathering about?
You can't invent something in the modern age?

>>15111
Can we flip this?
>Let's imagine a world where blacks, as a civilization, would be without appropriating culture, technology and riches from other civilizations.

>>15162
You can't invent something that's already been invented. You can improve something but you're not inventing shit.

We are all standing on the backs of everyone who came before us and ignoring that for racial supremacy does nothing except expose your ignorance of history.

By your logic whites "invented" modern homosexuality. They "invented" modern pedophilia. They "invented" modern serial murders. Should I go on?

>>15167
How about you create your own thread for it?

>>15168
>You can't invent something that's already been invented.
Calculus, the telephone, the cure for polio, ... these were all invented at two different times by two different people. Well, maybe not the telephone, there was a lot of bribery, burglary and corruption regarding who got their name on the patent of that one...

>15169
Also; jet engines.

>>15111
Mediterranean people are white you ignorant nig nog

>>15111
Mediterranean people are white you ignorant nig nog

>>15179
Not according to racists.

According to those same racists a couple decades earlier Irish people weren't really white, they were some kind of weird subservient subspecies with a potato fetish.

well they're white when they contribute, contributing to society literally drains you of melanin

>>15183
Why are trailer parks full of white people then?

Stonehenge is 4,500 years old is it not? What were the romans building then?

>>15186
This. OP casually forgets to mention one of the ancient civilizations most wondrous feats of Man. Brits so British we don't even call them British; godforbid anyone say the British are white, but their forefather were.

There's no such thing as cultural appropriation, only cultural exchange, and what we see is that while, yes, some peoples rise to prominence with tools originally developed by others, plenty of other peoples stick those same tools straight up their own asses.
Consider, if you will, the fact that a century ago just 1% of South Koreans attended primary school, and private property didn't even exist as a concept. Look at South Korea today.
Conversely, niggers.

>>15124
How are Viking dragon ships appropriation? Which cultures did they borrow for this tech?

File 15661764564.jpg - (35.49KB , 538x450 , proxy_duckduckgo_com.jpg )

>>15212
Me thinks the chink.

>>15214
Nope...

>>15111
Are you implying that Italians aren't Caucasian? Are you fucking retarded? What about the Spanish, not Mexicans, but the Spanish. They too are Caucasian. Than you have the middle east. You need to brush up on your understanding about race. No Judeo-Christian religion? Have you seen how white Jews are?

You do realize that Greeks and Romans are white, don't you?

Whites have had so many innovations I don't see why you'd focus on them as the receiver of ideas. We've added so much. I don't see where this is coming from. Head scratcher be here. lol Why work against whites? Why bring issues for them? Whites are among the best people in the world. If you look at the statistics we are the most harmless of human groups. Why focus on the downsides of us when there's so much good done? I don't see why. It's nastiness. It's not for the greatest good. The experiences of whites matter. Not just a fairly small amount. A whole lot. A significant amount. No tiny particle of importance is fitting here. lol

both whites and caucasians ain't races so you should just stfu and gtfo fuck you

both whites and caucasians ain't races so you should just stfu and gtfo fuck you

both whites and caucasians ain't races so you should just stfu and gtfo fuck you

File 15739859129.png - (231.01KB , 511x357 , 54a9cdbb5900b55c84ec1fcb0aafa3e4fa375f56fc86c5fd99.png )

>>15267
>>15268
>>15269
Goober?

>Let's imagine a world where whites (French, Germs, Scandi and Anglos) as a civilization would be without appropriating culture, technology and riches from other people's.
Let's level whatever field you're playing on, no culture, technology or riches from others - all civs.

>Also remember that whites before contact with Rome had no literature or construction capabilities beyond wooden buildings. They did have Bronze Age weapons, though. Starting year: 200 B.C.
So in 200 B.C. the whites steam roll every other Civ...
Let's be clear the Romans (who were the ones who held them in check) appropriated almost everything from other cultures including their entire pantheon.

So now you got whitey steam rolling across the globe, slapping henges all over the place as a testament to their awesomeness. Fast forward a few thousand years to the internet age and we have some hut-shitter rambling on about how if other Civs had worked together in 200BC. they could have made the world a better place by stopping the whitey before his dominance.

Shit's 'like circlular you know, like stone henge....

>>15111
Mining copper in Manchester England 3000bc

Check english tin mining pre Rome

Fcuk nut