File 168647825214.jpg - (197.76KB , 787x1179 , BLQ66592.jpg )

Of course, it's inevitable that at some point one of these beams is going to be directly pointed at the photographic source. Although I have not come across an image where this is perfectly the case as yet, there have been several very close calls of which this is just one of them. It would appear that the beam emitting from the right breast is heading off to the right, but because Eufrat is stood with her left shoulder low, her boob has swung out to the left firing the beam almost directly at the camera.

Judging by the diameter of the innermost (nipple) beam which can be seen passing over the camera I would estimate that it is no more than 3 inches (7.5cm) above the lens. Because the outer part of the beam (areola) only shows well at the blue end of the spectrum I was unable to determine whether the camera lens was actually within its diameter or not. If you look at the lower part of the image you can see her feet and legs are clear of any material, but from above her belly button, the image appears less clear.

Whatever, I've studied this segment of the movie numerous times to see if any distortions or electrical interference show up in the clip but I've been unable to find any. This could either mean that either (a) The beams are too weak or simply do not have a "visible" effect on photographic equipment. Or (b) The beam never passed through the camera.

File 168647925218.jpg - (508.48KB , 1221x816 , BLQ22945.jpg )

An image that was already processed by me several months previous to this didn't show anything at all. It wasn't until I looked in the area below 380nm that the beams showed up.
The graph shows a peak wavelength (371-373nm) where the beam becomes visible (marked with the yellow crosshair) and shows where the reading was taken.

File 168648099893.jpg - (558.79KB , 1444x1090 , BLQ29752-5.jpg )

Now, one of the more unusual manifestations that I've come across appears in the well-studied "Drikins-Klaman" photoshoot that Eufrat did. This shoot produced some of the clearest and most compelling images caused by a combination of original camera equipment, location, and activity produced by Eufrat on that day. At almost every wavelength studied from 370nm up to 380nm there are features that show up and make the structure that surrounds her even more complex and puzzling. I often return to these movies solely to see what will show up next!

In these three images, what appears to start out as small 5-7cm "bubbles" that grow at a perfectly synchronous rate from both nipples, end up forming a "chain" of around 3 bubbles that link together. However, instead of progressing out from her nipples as usual, they appear to move at a right angle across her body toward her breastbone. Here they link with the bubbles emerging from the other nipple and then rapidly move away from her body still connected to her tits in a long arc. (pic. 1+ 2)

This stretched-out bubble frustratingly passes out of the field of view but stretches the bubble's shape like pulling out a length of soft chewing gum. (pic.3) The strands eventually dissipate and leave no residual glow in preceding frames.
Although small "sparks" have been seen to jump between one part of the areola to the other, or from the areola to the nipple on the same breast, I've never seen the left and right boobs on the same body connected directly, which in these images they appear to do so.

File 168648231316.jpg - (317.61KB , 1023x1504 , BLQ333293.jpg )

The next images are by far the most fascinating so far in that I've found a link between "Bubble" progression and how they allow women to become "connected" without producing beams.
Most of the time when women produce the beams they appear as very faint, perfectly straight shafts of light. Within those beams, there is an outer beam which takes the diameter of the areola, an inner beam, which takes up the diameter of the nipple, and a very faint and extremely narrow beam emitting from the very centre of the nipple. (see img#7834 above)
Now I'm pretty sure that it's when those very narrow beams cross or come into contact with each other on two separate women that energy can flow between them linking their tits. However, I had a problem because I've found that some women "connect" even when the beams aren't present. The answer to this came initially with this picture but I never realised it at the time so never published it.

It shows Eufrat sitting on a guy's face and in the image, along with the usual "ghost" images of past beams you can see what look like arcs of light surrounding both her tits and her lower body.
I made these out to be expanding bubbles of energy that never made it away from her body and only the ghost images of them remained.
These are quite bright actually being at 375nm, their significance would only become apparent once I looked below this 375nm wavelength.

File 168651059733.jpg - (735.63KB , 1280x1920 , BLQ_55443.jpg )

In this image, Eufrat and Bijou are linked by an arc of material which I've funnily christened an "arc-spark". Now most "sparks" between women I've found travel to the opposing female via the path of least resistance. But sometimes they appear to arc away from their bodies as in posts #7783 & #7824. I never saw the significance of this until this image. The arcs are of perfectly spherical radius and once I took the wavelength down to 373nm the host bubbles that the sparks were travelling around became very faintly visible!

The only way I can explain what is happening here is that both women are producing the bubbles that we've already seen before in post #7727, to #7752, but somehow these are remaining attached to the body but growing exponentially. Once the spheres grow to a size where their radius encompasses the other woman's nipple current flows around the bubble to the opposing breast. Usually, as the bubbles grow in size and age they get dimmer until they become invisible once they have moved far enough from the body. But these bubbles have grown to over 2ft (61cm) in diameter and the combined energy of both women could be what makes them remain visible at 373nm.

Dark

Who are you exactly?

You have over a hundred posts here but you never said who you were.

>>7840

Hi Curious,

I can't say exactly where I work or what I do for obvious reasons, but I can tell you that I work somewhere where there is equipment that I'm not "qualified" to use.
I've never studied photo processing and the skills I'm using to produce these images are ones purely gained by watching others who ARE skilled and qualified. And yes, I have had them look over my findings, but as I've said before, the evidence is never acted upon. I feel people way above me know of this but it is "covered up" for some reason.

This thread is the only place I can share my findings with people. With that in mind, Thomas and I have managed to book the model we had last year again for the 17th of July. Because we have become more confident that these phenomena are caused by some sort of electromagnetic interaction between the women and the planetary field, we're going to salt the area with magnetometers to see if she has any noticeable effect on her surroundings. Last year's little adventure was expensive, and this year's almost twice as much!

File 169918821851.jpg - (300.05KB , 938x1400 , BLQ_76Y.jpg )

File 169918852399.jpg - (323.47KB , 851x1280 , BLQ47898.jpg )

File 169918870031.jpg - (412.17KB , 2397x1539 , BLQ2493.jpg )

File 169918878889.jpg - (263.40KB , 1224x918 , BLQ_34452.jpg )

File 16991888245.jpg - (145.78KB , 1280x720 , BLQ_MAK.jpg )

File 169918886410.jpg - (252.60KB , 1289x968 , BLQ_33135.jpg )

File 169918890075.jpg - (168.01KB , 1536x864 , BLQ_771881_7.jpg )

File 169980579953.jpg - (127.02KB , 800x1200 , BLQ_2333_DISC.jpg )

File 170102155080.jpg - (243.87KB , 855x1287 , BLQ_2237.jpg )

Is there anything new with this? What happened to Dark?

>>7864
Believe it or not but I've been promoted. This is good news bad news really, because I'm now on a much higher pay band but I no longer work in the department where I used to use the "machine". I haven't been in there since September of last year so haven't been able to carry on with my work.
I do however have many images that I processed but didn't have time to post and explain so I'll do this in the coming weeks as I have a little more time to spare now.
We had a frustrating day with our model in July in that we booked everything, found a perfect location, and got all our equipment working, but had absolutely no visible activity with her. The only saving grace was that we recorded very definite field distortions caused by her. We suspected that these women affect the area around them magnetically and our mass scattering of magnetometers proved that this is indeed the case. Our model distorted the natural magnetic field over an area of some 487,000sq/ft, but considering that she didn't appear to have any outbursts while we were on site this figure may be only a "resting" number. If we could have carried out the study during an outburst I'm sure the figures would have been much higher. I'm working with Tom on and off when I can to try and translate the numbers onto a map.

I'll post as much as I can when I can.

File 170826160747.jpg - (433.41KB , 1776x900 , 96671.jpg )

File 17082616383.jpg - (472.44KB , 1671x960 , BLQ27211.jpg )

File 170826166410.jpg - (534.10KB , 1416x1209 , Schem.jpg )

File 170826185114.jpg - (316.90KB , 1304x644 , 33482.jpg )

File 170826188870.jpg - (203.33KB , 1228x957 , 99412.jpg )

File 17082619163.jpg - (318.03KB , 1378x768 , 2170.jpg )

File 171007663340.jpg - (350.39KB , 1759x756 , BLQ77674.jpg )

Models producing bubble chains.

File 171007666169.jpg - (1.04MB , 1280x1920 , 211239.jpg )

File 171007669460.jpg - (1.81MB , 2266x3405 , BLQ5772.jpg )

File 171128135392.jpg - (610.73KB , 2092x1198 , BLQ_24542.jpg )

>>7286

File 171507888088.jpg - (1.86MB , 2400x1800 , BLQ32297.jpg )

A strange image appears to show energy leaving this model's body not only in the usual way through beams and strange arcs but also flowing down the weir in the water!
Water is often seen glowing at a fairly bright wavelength in the vicinity where the model's body touches the water sometimes by almost 5nm.
However, this image shows material flowing down the weir and being carried away from her body while she fires two very (relatively) bright beams high into the air.

File 171905439441.jpg - (527.85KB , 2972x858 , BLQ1956_7.jpg )

I discovered some time ago by accident that the model called "Bijou" or sometimes "Stracy Stone" also produced beams. (The first instance of this can be seen in #7757)
However, I've noticed that the interaction between Eufrat and Bijou appears to be more impressive than with other model combinations.
In the following images, you will notice that the connections lack the narrow bright electrical features seen in other images as they tend to be far more subtle.
Not only are the connections extensive but they also attain a remarkable degree of symmetry. Normally two models in close proximity will see connections made that cover the path of least resistance (i.e. almost direct) But with Eufrat and Bijou these connections arc away from their bodies in a spiral pattern. This may be as a result of expanding "bubbles" of energy, with these connections following around the outside of those bubbles.
["Bubbles" have been noted in images above and appear to emerge from the nipples sometimes growing to grapefruit or football size before breaking free and drifting away from the body. Or they continue to expand to an indeterminate size in situ.]

These images were taken from a movie where ambient lighting was reduced to such levels that these features were more easily seen than in other pictures of Eufrat and Bijou during the day. As a result, I didn't have to go so hard in extracting the data or enhancing the image. Other features can also be seen in the images these being mainly "ghost beams" the remains of beams that are no longer being produced by the body but contain a certain amount of energy and can still be bright enough to be seen in the exposures.
Many metal fixtures in the images can also be seen to be glowing intensely and I can only imagine that this is the result of the extended and large magnetic field in the room caused by the two women.

File 171905441721.jpg - (504.60KB , 2305x648 , BLQ1958_9.jpg )

>>7888
It's been known for a long time that women have strange powers. Many of the ancient religions had them as almost superhuman figures.

True Anon, I often thought that many of the images of women with rays and such coming from their bodies were more symbolic rather than actual. But from the studies that I've done, it would appear that the latter is true.
It involves the planet's magnetic field and some physical reaction (biological perhaps) within their bodies. It has something to do with their breasts and rib cage as these always show up brightest in all of the images. The breasts especially are the one thing that they have that men don't so must be considered as the main features of the study.
I have by the way looked at men to see if they produce beams and after a week of looking at shirtless guys (not something a heterosexual guy wants to do!) I didn't find one showing these beams, so I'm sure they can be only attributed to women.

Myself and a friend have hired a known model who has a reputation for causing all sorts of minor electrical "gremlins" in cameras, phones and such with other photographers so know that this phenomenon is real.

So, here we have more deep-processed images that show beams and rings, and arcs. Some of these images are almost black in the original image in order to fetch out the features which lie near 370nm (extremely faint)
I've then removed the brighter (overexposed) beams and overlaid the image taken at the usual 375+nm to make the image more recognisable.
These "rings" appear to radiate out from the body although it's not known if they originate from the nipples or the body in general. Every image I have captured of them shows them a fair distance away from the body and I'm pretty sure they are separate features to the "bubbles" which expand from the nipples.
"Arcs" appear to be a connection between two or more women. Although they are not always complete, many of the arcs can be traced back to the respective nipples of individual women. I'm assuming that these are some sort of low current conduit between the women and their shape is created by the combined magnetic fields of them.

File 172468300355.jpg - (561.35KB , 2048x1080 , BLQ_44708.jpg )

File 172468302041.jpg - (225.79KB , 800x600 , BLQ_44884.jpg )

File 172468303843.jpg - (257.67KB , 841x1262 , BLQ57759.jpg )

File 172468306169.jpg - (199.46KB , 800x800 , 7626.jpg )

File 172468307691.jpg - (398.74KB , 1500x1000 , BLQ_7654.jpg )

File 172468316561.jpg - (0.96MB , 1409x2113 , j7b_034.jpg )

File 172951230582.jpg - (231.24KB , 933x1400 , BLQ_5333.jpg )

File 172951232145.jpg - (268.82KB , 1536x864 , BLQ_5320.jpg )

File 173127549851.jpg - (257.61KB , 1920x1080 , BLQ11201.jpg )

File 173515149638.jpg - (81.64KB , 901x534 , BLQ6861.jpg )

It's just shit hitting the lens at peculiar angles, these kinds of porn shots are done with professional lighting setups. Get a candid photo and observe no "rib rays"

Guy coming up with a magnetic field psychic E edgy theory and not even considering the enormous lightbulbs that get carted onto porn shoots and aimed square at the woman's tits and pussies.

>>7907
>7906
If you look back through some of the pictures you can see candid> images that have these things. The original poster also hired a model and shot his own images I guess without lighting etc, how you explain that?

>>7908

I can see porn, porn, porn, porn and one pap of Britney Spears, all of it of course having been shooped before public release

I looked at the photo he took and I think it's sunlight and/or effects caused by post processing

This reminds me of when people were trying to convince me halos are real by showing photos of too sharp JPGs causing errors and strangeness

Moreover this experiment they ran was not serious. Why did they not have the model change position right away, to see if the energy rays changed too? Why did they not take photos before she arrived, while she was fully clothed, wearing cotton, wearing leather, wearing plastic? Why did he not show the result when taking photo of a man? Or with the camera at a 90° angle to the previous position? And more especially, why did they make the model play with her pussy like that? OP admits himself it was a "treat" to see titties irl. Run out of time for more serious things? I question OPs intent and professionalism.

This is the definition of psuedoscience... There's no comparison, there's no repetition. So how can it possible rule out confounding factors?

This isn't experimenting to see if the sky is blue or chickens lay eggs, this is a crazy hypothesis so you need some crazy evidence to support it. And porn shoots, pap shots and an excuse to touch yourself isn't enough.

>>7910
Hello Anonymous, I don't think the original poster is trying to prove anything he is asking questions about the things he's seen.
I have to admit I do believe in other things that we can't explain and I believe we women are special. It been know since ancient times that women are connected with mother Earth and have special relationship with her.
I think what dark has done here is highlight this.