Hi Curious,
In answer to your question, I have a few bits of information and more theories I guess.

I've had more time with our equipment and although I'm not "officially" allowed to use it, I'm becoming more adept at being able to fetch out finer details and structures in some of the images. Particularly now that the software has been updated and a lot of the glitches which were causing horizontal lines across the pictures have been rectified.
I'm still limited in the time I get to use the computer and there has been talk by management about passwording some of the equipment. (including the one I covertly use) If this occurs I either find out what the passwords are, or my research ends as it's the only way I can extract the information from the images.
Fingers crossed this never happens as up to now I have had no luck convincing anyone that this needs looking into.

I don't know if I mentioned it before, but Thomas and I have secured the model we had last year to do another photo shoot with us this summer. Dates haven't been worked out yet as she's busy most of the summer, but she's promised us some time to study her while she's in the U.K.

We're also taking a total of 4 magnetometers with us to see if it is possible to measure any kind of change in the magnetic field. If anyone has any thoughts on this (we're pretty much clueless) please leave a message here. Again it's a very expensive undertaking for us what with cameras, equipment, travel and the model herself so if anyone has any ideas that we can do at the time to make the study more complete please say something.

File 16810630696.jpg - (407.18KB , 2250x1500 , BLG_639.jpg )

I have some more images that are worth uploading the first of which is truly stunning! This image I obtained by removing the stabilization initially and then replacing the layers that I'd pre-scanned in 'H" alpha from 373-377nm. Because of the dim lighting of the shoot anyway, it's turned out very clear and shows not only clouds of material but also beams which aren't very bright or well-defined (possibly old structures) But the main point of interest are the two very clear "sparks" which like the women's tits!

You can see them very clearly aching out from Eufrat's tits and travelling down to the model lying down. What I've noticed with these sparks is that they almost follow the path of the beam straight out from the nipples before heading off to the other woman. As we saw in post #7801 the sparks can follow an almost perfectly straight line along the beams until they encounter another beam from a separate female. It's then that a "connection" is made, the beam disappears and is only picked up in the 373-377nm range as a ghost image. The connection remains until one or both of the tits are blocked by hands clothes etc. Like the beams themselves, I have no idea just how long these sparks can get, but I think it's obvious from this image that these can be as long as 160cm AT LEAST and so can't be simply explained as "static electricity" !

The graph bottom left by the way shows that although they don't appear bright in this image as I also wanted to show the other structures, they are very bright at the 373nm wavelength showing two very obvious peaks. The arrows indicate the place of measurement.

File 168116213144.jpg - (669.52KB , 934x1400 , BLG718.jpg )

The other thing I'm finding is that in the lower regions of the visible range <375nm women are surrounded by a very light halo of material. This is completely invisible above 375nm and is not related to overexposure or anything like that as the glow only surrounds women who are producing beams.
In this image, Eufrat is actually wearing white stockings, but I've masked them in order to fetch out the detail of this "glow" that surrounds the lower part of her leg. There are in total 8 separate beams radiating out from Eufrat's tits and correspond to her being in different positions when the beams were formed. However, most of these cannot be seen as I was unable to hit a specific wavelength that would show all of them.

This was a very "clean" photo shoot actually as beams are well-defined and clear with little material surrounding Eufrat herself unlike image #7814. Again the area surrounding the areolas appears very bright as does part of her left rib cage. Although some banding can just be seen on her left breast, two very clear bands can be seen on the right.
Looking at these bands you can see that they occur in a spiral pattern rather than a concentric one and change position from picture to picture suggesting energy moving from the outer areas of her tits in towards the areola.

File 168535793864.jpg - (78.16KB , 1024x1341 , erma3nadgjfqzwb6rxwg.jpg )

Interesting.

Have you ever considered that in many 12th to 14th-century paintings, holy people were depicted with rays of light or (beams of light) either coming from them or being shone on them from heaven or god?
Now I understand that it's not quite the same as a woman having them coming out of her breasts but the similarity of what you have been showing is remarkable.

Many other cultures as someone else has already mentioned hold women in very high regard, many having special powers and abilities not to mention the unique ability to create life. Her breasts are an essential part of this ability so shooting beams of light from them for whatever reason might not be as far-fetched as it may sound.
I watch this thread with interest.

File 168535796382.jpg - (527.55KB , 800x1111 , Transfiguratio.jpg )

>>7829

File 168640982267.jpg - (341.49KB , 1279x1437 , BLQ771234_1&BLQ_233.jpg )

Thank's for that suggestion anonymous, I must admit I've never even thought about that suggestion but it makes perfect sense.
Someone said before that many things in our ancient past had far more significance then than they do today. Many of the things we take today as superstition were reality back then and I'd like to think that they probably knew more about the unseen than we could ever imagine.

In regards to your suggestion about "beams of light from heaven" the only problem I would have with aligning this to what we see here is that in the paintings these beams can be associated with both men and women. They more often than not come from heaven down to Earth and not the other way around. But I would be a fool to totally discount it as these paintings are not obviously accurate, but rather more of a representation.

In these two images, a strange "L" shaped beam can be seen. I've noted this feature in several images I've processed and as yet have not been able to explain the reason for it. Although these two pictures are of Eufrat I have some with other models also.

File 16864105087.jpg - (598.55KB , 935x1402 , N+BLG_801.jpg )

In the higher quality "Klaman" images I'm able to detect a very narrow, yet very bright (relatively) beam coming from the very centre of her nipples and within the main beams at the 373nm wavelength. Again this is an already-known feature but although the beams have been seen to extend to 40 or 50ft (15 - 18m) it is unknown how far these "micro-beams" extend.

File 168647825214.jpg - (197.76KB , 787x1179 , BLQ66592.jpg )

Of course, it's inevitable that at some point one of these beams is going to be directly pointed at the photographic source. Although I have not come across an image where this is perfectly the case as yet, there have been several very close calls of which this is just one of them. It would appear that the beam emitting from the right breast is heading off to the right, but because Eufrat is stood with her left shoulder low, her boob has swung out to the left firing the beam almost directly at the camera.

Judging by the diameter of the innermost (nipple) beam which can be seen passing over the camera I would estimate that it is no more than 3 inches (7.5cm) above the lens. Because the outer part of the beam (areola) only shows well at the blue end of the spectrum I was unable to determine whether the camera lens was actually within its diameter or not. If you look at the lower part of the image you can see her feet and legs are clear of any material, but from above her belly button, the image appears less clear.

Whatever, I've studied this segment of the movie numerous times to see if any distortions or electrical interference show up in the clip but I've been unable to find any. This could either mean that either (a) The beams are too weak or simply do not have a "visible" effect on photographic equipment. Or (b) The beam never passed through the camera.

File 168647925218.jpg - (508.48KB , 1221x816 , BLQ22945.jpg )

An image that was already processed by me several months previous to this didn't show anything at all. It wasn't until I looked in the area below 380nm that the beams showed up.
The graph shows a peak wavelength (371-373nm) where the beam becomes visible (marked with the yellow crosshair) and shows where the reading was taken.

File 168648099893.jpg - (558.79KB , 1444x1090 , BLQ29752-5.jpg )

Now, one of the more unusual manifestations that I've come across appears in the well-studied "Drikins-Klaman" photoshoot that Eufrat did. This shoot produced some of the clearest and most compelling images caused by a combination of original camera equipment, location, and activity produced by Eufrat on that day. At almost every wavelength studied from 370nm up to 380nm there are features that show up and make the structure that surrounds her even more complex and puzzling. I often return to these movies solely to see what will show up next!

In these three images, what appears to start out as small 5-7cm "bubbles" that grow at a perfectly synchronous rate from both nipples, end up forming a "chain" of around 3 bubbles that link together. However, instead of progressing out from her nipples as usual, they appear to move at a right angle across her body toward her breastbone. Here they link with the bubbles emerging from the other nipple and then rapidly move away from her body still connected to her tits in a long arc. (pic. 1+ 2)

This stretched-out bubble frustratingly passes out of the field of view but stretches the bubble's shape like pulling out a length of soft chewing gum. (pic.3) The strands eventually dissipate and leave no residual glow in preceding frames.
Although small "sparks" have been seen to jump between one part of the areola to the other, or from the areola to the nipple on the same breast, I've never seen the left and right boobs on the same body connected directly, which in these images they appear to do so.

File 168648231316.jpg - (317.61KB , 1023x1504 , BLQ333293.jpg )

The next images are by far the most fascinating so far in that I've found a link between "Bubble" progression and how they allow women to become "connected" without producing beams.
Most of the time when women produce the beams they appear as very faint, perfectly straight shafts of light. Within those beams, there is an outer beam which takes the diameter of the areola, an inner beam, which takes up the diameter of the nipple, and a very faint and extremely narrow beam emitting from the very centre of the nipple. (see img#7834 above)
Now I'm pretty sure that it's when those very narrow beams cross or come into contact with each other on two separate women that energy can flow between them linking their tits. However, I had a problem because I've found that some women "connect" even when the beams aren't present. The answer to this came initially with this picture but I never realised it at the time so never published it.

It shows Eufrat sitting on a guy's face and in the image, along with the usual "ghost" images of past beams you can see what look like arcs of light surrounding both her tits and her lower body.
I made these out to be expanding bubbles of energy that never made it away from her body and only the ghost images of them remained.
These are quite bright actually being at 375nm, their significance would only become apparent once I looked below this 375nm wavelength.

File 168651059733.jpg - (735.63KB , 1280x1920 , BLQ_55443.jpg )

In this image, Eufrat and Bijou are linked by an arc of material which I've funnily christened an "arc-spark". Now most "sparks" between women I've found travel to the opposing female via the path of least resistance. But sometimes they appear to arc away from their bodies as in posts #7783 & #7824. I never saw the significance of this until this image. The arcs are of perfectly spherical radius and once I took the wavelength down to 373nm the host bubbles that the sparks were travelling around became very faintly visible!

The only way I can explain what is happening here is that both women are producing the bubbles that we've already seen before in post #7727, to #7752, but somehow these are remaining attached to the body but growing exponentially. Once the spheres grow to a size where their radius encompasses the other woman's nipple current flows around the bubble to the opposing breast. Usually, as the bubbles grow in size and age they get dimmer until they become invisible once they have moved far enough from the body. But these bubbles have grown to over 2ft (61cm) in diameter and the combined energy of both women could be what makes them remain visible at 373nm.

Dark

Who are you exactly?

You have over a hundred posts here but you never said who you were.

>>7840

Hi Curious,

I can't say exactly where I work or what I do for obvious reasons, but I can tell you that I work somewhere where there is equipment that I'm not "qualified" to use.
I've never studied photo processing and the skills I'm using to produce these images are ones purely gained by watching others who ARE skilled and qualified. And yes, I have had them look over my findings, but as I've said before, the evidence is never acted upon. I feel people way above me know of this but it is "covered up" for some reason.

This thread is the only place I can share my findings with people. With that in mind, Thomas and I have managed to book the model we had last year again for the 17th of July. Because we have become more confident that these phenomena are caused by some sort of electromagnetic interaction between the women and the planetary field, we're going to salt the area with magnetometers to see if she has any noticeable effect on her surroundings. Last year's little adventure was expensive, and this year's almost twice as much!

File 169918821851.jpg - (300.05KB , 938x1400 , BLQ_76Y.jpg )

File 169918852399.jpg - (323.47KB , 851x1280 , BLQ47898.jpg )

File 169918870031.jpg - (412.17KB , 2397x1539 , BLQ2493.jpg )

File 169918878889.jpg - (263.40KB , 1224x918 , BLQ_34452.jpg )

File 16991888245.jpg - (145.78KB , 1280x720 , BLQ_MAK.jpg )

File 169918886410.jpg - (252.60KB , 1289x968 , BLQ_33135.jpg )

File 169918890075.jpg - (168.01KB , 1536x864 , BLQ_771881_7.jpg )

File 169980579953.jpg - (127.02KB , 800x1200 , BLQ_2333_DISC.jpg )

File 170102155080.jpg - (243.87KB , 855x1287 , BLQ_2237.jpg )

Is there anything new with this? What happened to Dark?

>>7864
Believe it or not but I've been promoted. This is good news bad news really, because I'm now on a much higher pay band but I no longer work in the department where I used to use the "machine". I haven't been in there since September of last year so haven't been able to carry on with my work.
I do however have many images that I processed but didn't have time to post and explain so I'll do this in the coming weeks as I have a little more time to spare now.
We had a frustrating day with our model in July in that we booked everything, found a perfect location, and got all our equipment working, but had absolutely no visible activity with her. The only saving grace was that we recorded very definite field distortions caused by her. We suspected that these women affect the area around them magnetically and our mass scattering of magnetometers proved that this is indeed the case. Our model distorted the natural magnetic field over an area of some 487,000sq/ft, but considering that she didn't appear to have any outbursts while we were on site this figure may be only a "resting" number. If we could have carried out the study during an outburst I'm sure the figures would have been much higher. I'm working with Tom on and off when I can to try and translate the numbers onto a map.

I'll post as much as I can when I can.

File 170826160747.jpg - (433.41KB , 1776x900 , 96671.jpg )

File 17082616383.jpg - (472.44KB , 1671x960 , BLQ27211.jpg )

File 170826166410.jpg - (534.10KB , 1416x1209 , Schem.jpg )

File 170826185114.jpg - (316.90KB , 1304x644 , 33482.jpg )

File 170826188870.jpg - (203.33KB , 1228x957 , 99412.jpg )

File 17082619163.jpg - (318.03KB , 1378x768 , 2170.jpg )

File 171007663340.jpg - (350.39KB , 1759x756 , BLQ77674.jpg )

Models producing bubble chains.

File 171007666169.jpg - (1.04MB , 1280x1920 , 211239.jpg )

File 171007669460.jpg - (1.81MB , 2266x3405 , BLQ5772.jpg )

File 171128135392.jpg - (610.73KB , 2092x1198 , BLQ_24542.jpg )

>>7286

File 171507888088.jpg - (1.86MB , 2400x1800 , BLQ32297.jpg )

A strange image appears to show energy leaving this model's body not only in the usual way through beams and strange arcs but also flowing down the weir in the water!
Water is often seen glowing at a fairly bright wavelength in the vicinity where the model's body touches the water sometimes by almost 5nm.
However, this image shows material flowing down the weir and being carried away from her body while she fires two very (relatively) bright beams high into the air.

File 171905439441.jpg - (527.85KB , 2972x858 , BLQ1956_7.jpg )

I discovered some time ago by accident that the model called "Bijou" or sometimes "Stracy Stone" also produced beams. (The first instance of this can be seen in #7757)
However, I've noticed that the interaction between Eufrat and Bijou appears to be more impressive than with other model combinations.
In the following images, you will notice that the connections lack the narrow bright electrical features seen in other images as they tend to be far more subtle.
Not only are the connections extensive but they also attain a remarkable degree of symmetry. Normally two models in close proximity will see connections made that cover the path of least resistance (i.e. almost direct) But with Eufrat and Bijou these connections arc away from their bodies in a spiral pattern. This may be as a result of expanding "bubbles" of energy, with these connections following around the outside of those bubbles.
["Bubbles" have been noted in images above and appear to emerge from the nipples sometimes growing to grapefruit or football size before breaking free and drifting away from the body. Or they continue to expand to an indeterminate size in situ.]

These images were taken from a movie where ambient lighting was reduced to such levels that these features were more easily seen than in other pictures of Eufrat and Bijou during the day. As a result, I didn't have to go so hard in extracting the data or enhancing the image. Other features can also be seen in the images these being mainly "ghost beams" the remains of beams that are no longer being produced by the body but contain a certain amount of energy and can still be bright enough to be seen in the exposures.
Many metal fixtures in the images can also be seen to be glowing intensely and I can only imagine that this is the result of the extended and large magnetic field in the room caused by the two women.

File 171905441721.jpg - (504.60KB , 2305x648 , BLQ1958_9.jpg )

>>7888
It's been known for a long time that women have strange powers. Many of the ancient religions had them as almost superhuman figures.

True Anon, I often thought that many of the images of women with rays and such coming from their bodies were more symbolic rather than actual. But from the studies that I've done, it would appear that the latter is true.
It involves the planet's magnetic field and some physical reaction (biological perhaps) within their bodies. It has something to do with their breasts and rib cage as these always show up brightest in all of the images. The breasts especially are the one thing that they have that men don't so must be considered as the main features of the study.
I have by the way looked at men to see if they produce beams and after a week of looking at shirtless guys (not something a heterosexual guy wants to do!) I didn't find one showing these beams, so I'm sure they can be only attributed to women.

Myself and a friend have hired a known model who has a reputation for causing all sorts of minor electrical "gremlins" in cameras, phones and such with other photographers so know that this phenomenon is real.

So, here we have more deep-processed images that show beams and rings, and arcs. Some of these images are almost black in the original image in order to fetch out the features which lie near 370nm (extremely faint)
I've then removed the brighter (overexposed) beams and overlaid the image taken at the usual 375+nm to make the image more recognisable.
These "rings" appear to radiate out from the body although it's not known if they originate from the nipples or the body in general. Every image I have captured of them shows them a fair distance away from the body and I'm pretty sure they are separate features to the "bubbles" which expand from the nipples.
"Arcs" appear to be a connection between two or more women. Although they are not always complete, many of the arcs can be traced back to the respective nipples of individual women. I'm assuming that these are some sort of low current conduit between the women and their shape is created by the combined magnetic fields of them.

File 172468300355.jpg - (561.35KB , 2048x1080 , BLQ_44708.jpg )

File 172468302041.jpg - (225.79KB , 800x600 , BLQ_44884.jpg )

File 172468303843.jpg - (257.67KB , 841x1262 , BLQ57759.jpg )

File 172468306169.jpg - (199.46KB , 800x800 , 7626.jpg )

File 172468307691.jpg - (398.74KB , 1500x1000 , BLQ_7654.jpg )

File 172468316561.jpg - (0.96MB , 1409x2113 , j7b_034.jpg )

File 172951230582.jpg - (231.24KB , 933x1400 , BLQ_5333.jpg )

File 172951232145.jpg - (268.82KB , 1536x864 , BLQ_5320.jpg )

File 173127549851.jpg - (257.61KB , 1920x1080 , BLQ11201.jpg )