/fl/ - Flash

>>

Anonymous 17/06/01(Thu)03:45 No. 21371 ID: e68e00

File new_1UP_correct+.swf - (4.97MB , new 1UP correct+.swf )

>>

Anonymous 17/06/01(Thu)03:48 No. 21372 ID: e68e00

File tj_correct.swf - (65.34KB )

>>

Anonymous 17/06/01(Thu)09:25 No. 21374 ID: 70dcaf

Is the purpose of this thread just to trigger minus8 fans who hate non-white characters?

>>

Anonymous 17/06/01(Thu)11:31 No. 21375 ID: 4a3d7b

>>21374
Other way around, I think he means to upset people who hated the fact that Minus8 drew his dudes as Asian or Black. The OP titled the thread "Colonized" after all

>>

Anonymous 17/06/07(Wed)07:35 No. 21386 ID: 70dcaf

>>21375
You know I assumed it was a misspelling of "colorized" because that's what he did to the girls.

>>

Anonymous 17/06/09(Fri)22:12 No. 21392 ID: bd1fc8

I know somebody was supposedly making a both-white, no x-ray version of >>21370, anyone know if anything ever came of that?

>>

white edit Anonymous 18/01/14(Sun)09:55 No. 21786 ID: ef37ff

File not_new[white_edit].swf - (7.31MB )

>>21392
i just threw this together. it' has the x-ray, but both parties are white. i used minus 8's original for her colors. then just lightened him up some. kept him a little darker than her for contrast. then gave him a purplish 'helmet'.

>>

white edit vag x-ray removed Anonymous 18/01/14(Sun)10:00 No. 21787 ID: ef37ff

File not_new[white_edit_noXrayish]].swf - (7.31MB )

i tried my best to remove the cock, and the vag from x-ray. the vag wasn't that difficult. the cock on the other hand i can't figure out. it seems tied to the penis with the flesh color.

so here is a white version without the vag shape in the x-ray.

>>

Anonymous 18/01/14(Sun)12:33 No. 21788 ID: 24445a

>>21786
>>21787
Do you have the fla file? Can you share it?
There's something that has been bothering me for a long time, around 1:25 Rosalina has her visible left eye half closed in a provocative manner, but her right eye is full open, derp

>>

Anonymous 18/01/14(Sun)15:31 No. 21789 ID: ef37ff

>>21788
for the original or my edits?

>>

Anonymous 18/01/14(Sun)15:57 No. 21790 ID: 24445a

>>21789
The error appears since the original, that's why it has been bothering me for so long
did you edit the fla file or is there a way to make edits on the swf's?

>>

Anonymous 18/01/14(Sun)16:42 No. 21791 ID: ef37ff

>>21790
i edit the swf in 'JPEXS Free Flash Decompiler'.
it's not letting me export a fla on not_new.swf

her eye being behind her bangs i don't see how you noticed lol.

>>

Anonymous 18/01/14(Sun)17:24 No. 21794 ID: 24445a

>>21791
I noticed it since the first days it was posted, but was afraid of asking -8 to correct it since you know of how bad he reacts sometimes, I hope he doesn't read this since he doesn't post much here anymore

>>

action script 2.0 support? Anonymous 18/01/16(Tue)05:59 No. 21795 ID: ef37ff

>>21794
ok i tried Sothink SWF decompiler (trash software) and it ran out of memory trying to export.

what do you use to edit .fla files? i grabbed a copy of Adobe Animate CC 18, and it doesn't support Action Script 2.0, only Action Script 3.0

cheers

>>

Anonymous 18/01/17(Wed)04:22 No. 21796 ID: ef37ff

>>21795
never mind. i managed to download a trial of Adobe Flash Professional CS5.5 from adobe. now i can open Action script 2.0 fla.

thank you 'painter'. :D

>>

white, no x-ray version Anonymous 18/01/21(Sun)11:53 No. 21799 ID: ef37ff

File not_new[white_edit_no_x-ray].swf - (7.31MB )

>>21392
i found what causes the x-ray. it's shape 68. here is a white on white, no x-ray version.
i updated the cock colors as well.

let me know what all y'all think.

>>

Anonymous 18/01/21(Sun)16:22 No. 21800 ID: eaaafc

>>21799
Is it possible to do the opposite of this and make the x-ray persistent throughout the whole animation?

Thank you.

>>

Anonymous 18/01/21(Sun)18:40 No. 21801 ID: ef37ff

>>21800
beyond my abilities sorry.

>>

Anonymous 18/02/28(Wed)03:59 No. 21825 ID: f81826

>>21787

Would it be possible for an edit with the silhouette being visible throughout?