I wish I'd screenshot the other dozen times this was posted over the years with all the different "enemies" in the image box.

Fuck of and die, if you can die, postbot.

No one's buying your "belligerence is manly" shit.

>>1957
Found the gay!!!

Gross!!! You go to the Navy!!!

OP, you don't want to go to war. Trust me, you don't. You want to test out what it's like? Okay, get some facial tattoos with Nazi and white supremacist symbols. Give away your home and all of your possessions, and buy a small knife. Now that you're homeless and minimally armed, go to your closest majority-black neighborhood with a sign that says something like "I want to kill and niggers".

Objective: survive.

That's IT. War is not for glory or honor or any of that bullshit. You won't GAIN anything. The only ones who profit from war are your corporate masters and rulers. War, for literally everyone that is actually involved rather than just holding an interest, is like this. You're in a place where everyone is trying to kill you, and you have no resources, you're cold and starving and constantly afraid to go to sleep.

All of war is old men telling young men to kill other young men so the old men can steal power and resources for themselves. You have more in common with a poor Iranian or Chinese than you will EVER have with an American politician or billionaire.

>>1962
Why are you weird racists always also cowards and know-it-alls?

Lmao. Like stfu and gtfo, you weird racist cocksucker.

>>1974
>Not wanting to go to war and die for some 70-year-old corporate billionaires is cowardice
You do you, bro. Go ahead. Get shot to death fighting over a patch of sand on the other side of the world if you think it makes you a bigger man

>>1975
>patch of sand
Are you still sour about Iraq, bro?

Don't be mad that a bad idea turned out to be a good idea. That's just life.

>>1977
What the fuck are you even talking about?

>>1980
I mean patch of sand implies that you're referring to our recent middle east wars that despite starting as retardation and greed turned out to be a really good idea.

>>1982
>turned out to be a really good idea
Ah yes, deposing the terrorists (al quada) and creating new terrorists (ISIS), spending trillions of dollars to turn a few thousand children into charcoal just to end up right back where we were, sure was a great idea!

>>1983
I was thinking more along the lines of the US military sitting on top of the world's oil supply, and any country that wanted to go to war with us would have to face the bulk of US forces in the ME before their war machine runs out of oil, which for China or Russia would be about 5 months.

File 16167454437.png - (630.99KB , 1080x1920 , 1607571209268.png )

Going to war is pretty courageous but at the same time, what are you fighting for? Your pay right? I thought the answer from John to the soldier
>Do no violence to any man, and be content with your pay (paraphrased, sorry)
Really summed it up.

You did it for money, that's it.

>>1998
Lol nobody fights for their pay.

Tell me what country you're from and I'll tell you why it's impossible for you to conceptualize our reasoning.

>>1975
>corporate billionaires
ummmm earth to stupid commie fuck. the banks are quadrillionaires. put down das kapital and pick up a book on elementary math.

File 162251158417.jpg - (18.52KB , 340x270 , GID.jpg )

>>2021
>banks
It's okay man, this is a safe space, you can say joos

File 162254710211.jpg - (26.74KB , 221x221 , 1363735802896.jpg )

>>2023
don't you talk about my jewish friends that way

File 162278603251.jpg - (88.26KB , 1050x640 , Temporarily Embarrassed Millionaires.jpg )

>>2024
No, no, it's okay, you say banks, you mean joos, just say what you mean here. There's no need for coded language here.

>>2025
>jooooooooos
>no need for codewords
okay rabbi tell me more

>>2026
"jooooooooos" is a codeword for a kvetching kike who ran of out citations from the talmud

>>2031
Alright. I'll bite. What's with the hatred of Jewish people?

>>2033
Not man enough to be a true misanthrope.

Racism is a little, petty hate for little, petty people.

>>2036
Jews aren't a race. Want proof? The majority of self-described jews in the world are ashkenazim, who are from the former Kingdom of Khazaria, which mass converted to Babylonian Talmudism using sephardic rabbis circa 800-900AD for political reasons (namely, the Christian Byzantine Empire to the West and the rising Caliphate to the South). That is to say, the majority of the world's self-described jews are jews by conversion and not by race.

Crying "racism" because somebody points out the jews is a sad cop-out, and it makes you seem like you have an intellect as low grade as the average kike.

>>2056
Yeah. It's nationality and a religion.

Why do you hate them?

>>2061
It's not a nationality. Jews are the nation-wreckers. The concept of a nation-state didn't even come into consideration until circa 800AD when Dante started promulgating the idea when what we today call Italy was recovering into city-states following the increasingly defunct Western half of the fallen Roman Empire. Jews have been about kings and city states for thousands of years prior, not nations in any modern sense of the world.

Why do I hate them? For one, I hate all satan-worshiping pedophile child molesters. For two, they actively scheme to cause trouble for me rather than sticking to their barbaric relic of a false religion in their sandbox containment zone.

>>2062
>It's not a nationality.
A percentage of the people who do or don't practice judaism are a nation, formerly without a state. They have a shared history, culture, language, religion, and origin.

Like Assyrians or Persians. There's no Assyria or Persia anymore. They're still technically nations, though.

There's also physical attributes associated with Jewish heritage. Isn't that how Hitler planned on identifying Jews?

>Jews are the nation-wreckers.
I've heard that before. What nation have they destroyed in the past?

>The concept of a nation-state didn't even come into consideration until circa 800AD when Dante started promulgating the idea when what we today call Italy was recovering into city-states following the increasingly defunct Western half of the fallen Roman Empire
That's debatable...

>For one, I hate all satan-worshiping pedophile child molesters.
Is every single Jewish person a satan-worshiping pedophile child molester?

>For two, they actively scheme to cause trouble for me rather than sticking to their barbaric relic of a false religion in their sandbox containment zone.
Lol what?

>>2066
First of all, we have to observe that they practice babylonian talmudism and kabbalah, not anything in their torah.

You're just making things up to suit your purposes if you think the modern nation-state existed over 1000 years ago. Empires are not nation-states. A great portion of the globe hadn't been converted into nation-states until after WWII. Even an "old world" country like Italy didn't assemble itself into a nation state until the late 1800s, meaning that the US, a "new world" country, did it some 100 years earlier.

As for all jews being pedophile child molesters, that's just a fact. It's right there in the beginning of Genesis. That's literally their covenant with their false g-d, and anybody who doesn't rebuke it is a willful pedophile child molester as well as criminally insane. This is in no way a difficult concept or anything that needs to be debated.

>>2069
>First of all, we have to observe that they practice babylonian talmudism and kabbalah, not anything in their torah.
Not sure what any of that has to do with what I just said, or how "we" would observe whatever you're talking about, but there are many sects of judaism. I'm unaware of the specifics of each sect.

>You're just making things up to suit your purposes if you think the modern nation-state existed over 1000 years ago. Empires are not nation-states. A great portion of the globe hadn't been converted into nation-states until after WWII. Even an "old world" country like Italy didn't assemble itself into a nation state until the late 1800s, meaning that the US, a "new world" country, did it some 100 years earlier.
I said that it's debatable.

>As for all jews being pedophile child molesters, that's just a fact.
I know a Jewish kid, and I'm positive that he's not a pedophile child molester. A bit goofy, maybe.

>It's right there in the beginning of Genesis.
Verse?

>That's literally their covenant with their false g-d, and anybody who doesn't rebuke it is a willful pedophile child molester as well as criminally insane.
I'm sure there's a more rational way to make whatever argument you're trying to make here. Some details would help.

>This is in no way a difficult concept or anything that needs to be debated.
It is when you have no support or evidence for anything you're saying, and when you ignore everything that I said in the post to which you're responding.

>>2070
>we
It's how we phrase things in academia, or even just in source code comments. I thought we were having an intellectual discussion.

As for the rest of it, you're being obtuse and misdirecting. You obviously have no basis for making any claim if you're pretending to be ignorant of the nature of their covenant with g-d, which is shared across all sects. Go read it yourself. Regale us with a book report. You won't need to go more than a few chapters in.

>>2071
Coward

>>2072
If you continue to reply I might get around to copypasting it for you. But until then it just shows the extent of denial that satanic pedophile child molesting jews are in about their own holy text.

>>2075
So, you believed someone's lies and now I should too?

File 162617787919.gif - (938.63KB , 500x281 , Obama Laugh.gif )

>>2076
He's also completely ignorant of history, specifically about how blood libel has been whispered conspiratorially since at least the middle ages if not prior, making this a completely unoriginal (and, notably, quite stupid) conspiracy theory.

>>2079
Yeah. Anti-Semiticism stems from the Kitos War.

File 162732491162.png - (52.37KB , 399x574 , RonaLabSLOGAN.png )

>>2079
this

File 162732542378.jpg - (808.08KB , 2073x2211 , SP Guide.jpg )

>>2075
dnt need to b a joo to b one
or to be commie bullshitter to make MEWTWO!

>>2085
>jews and semites are the same thing
Only kikes try to play such utterly ridiculous word games. Why would you claim that being from the bloodline of one of noah's three sons has anything to do with whether or not you're jewish? Did judaism start well after the flood? Are there not semites who aren't jews? Jews who aren't semites?

Stop and think about the sheer absurdity of your implication.

>>2095
>Only kikes try to play such utterly ridiculous word games.
Well, I'm not Jewish, so...

>Why would you claim that being from the bloodline of one of noah's three sons has anything to do with whether or not you're jewish? Did judaism start well after the flood? Are there not semites who aren't jews? Jews who aren't semites?
What does any of that have to do with what I said?

>>2095
>Stop and think
You try that recently yourself?

>>2096
You don't have to be jewish. You can just know what the minimum is that you're talking about. What a huge heap of decrepit cope that just was. Why did you even try to argue about it if you were just going to pretend you weren't juewish and you didn't know anything about them?

>>2097
What is this jew crew 2.0? Are you also going to claim innocence because you don't know anything about jews?

>>2098
...Alright. Let's try this again, you butthurt fucking retard.

The suspicion and hatred of the Jewish peoples has it's origins in the Kitos War.

>>2100
Why are you deflecting to something that happened well after Christ? That has nothing to do with the entire recorded history about how awful jews or, and nor does it have anything to do with my points.

>>2102
>Why are you deflecting to something that happened well after Christ?
Well, the first Jewish-Roman War was shortly after Christianity began. The Kitos War was the second war that consisted of Jewish Denizens slaughtering Roman citizen settlers completely depopulating areas in some cases then getting expelled from the Roman Empire all together including Israel. This war gave the Roman World the notions that Jews were murderous, state destabilizing traitors and later Christ killers. This stereotype spread to the west since Western Europe, and by extension it's former colonies, were created by the Roman Catholic Church and have spent the last 1,500 years, politically, larping as Romans(Germany was formerly the Holy Roman Empire).

>That has nothing to do with the entire recorded history about how awful jews
Well, it does in the sense that most of history is viewed through a political lense. That lense,throughout of most history, being despotism.

In despotism, when there is a singular ruler for life, the ruler is both figurehead and ultimate authority. IE Kings, Emperors, Dictators.

All public and private praise and blame fall on a single person government. They cannot step down. They cannot be viewed too unfavorably or they'll be overthrown. Too many missteps and the despot needs a to turn that negative attention towards a scapegoat which is almost always an estranged ethnic or religious minority, Jews were perfect for this scapegoat in Europe throughout history.

>nor does it have anything to do with my points.
You have no points. You, too, are a tyrant, of your own life, looking for a scapegoat lest you be blamed for your own inaction.

>>2105
That's a very roundabout way of trying to say that it isn't the jews, when, in fact, it is the jews.

>>2121
>in fact
A fact? Where?

>>2132
In all of my posts and none of yours, duh. Otherwise you'd be agreeing with me rather than spouting all that nonsense in desperation to defend the evil satanic talmudic jews.

>can't even reel in Taiwan
>had 50 years after the civil war to finish them off

Do they even care anymore

File 163979860881.jpg - (42.63KB , 920x692 , Pooh Xi.jpg )

>>2168
China cares, they just knew it'd lead to WW3 so they've held off.

However Xi has a very, very, very small penis and everyone in Taiwan having larger penises (even their women, Xi's is just that small) will eventually become too much for his fragile ego to bear.

Do you even have balls to go to war, pussy?

Stonetoss and Putin love Xi Jinping. You made them Cry.

This thread was made before Biden started the war with Russia. Feel old yet?

File 167277260329.png - (172.98KB , 664x411 , fire her.png )

>>2248
And so.....
What, do black lives matter anymore
Apparently not

>>2248
God damn delusional piece of shit, you think Russia invaded Ukraine because Biden did what?

Get your whole brain replaced, it's worthless.

File 167437641331.jpg - (136.63KB , 850x1305 , __sabrina_and_daniela_original_drawn_by_aestheticc.jpg )

>>2252
Biden was moving nukes through it, to protect his oil assets

His son is the CEO of a company out there

>>2252
Biden (or more likely his chief of staff or transition team or whomever else) hired Victoria Nuland back into the state department. She's the one that started the whole fake maidan Soros-Brzezinski color revolution under Obama when she was deputy assistent secretary of state. That's why Russia legally accepted the agreement from The Crimea to join the Russian Federation in order that Russia's people, industrial and millitary assets, and warm water port would remain as per the post-USSR gentleman's agreement.

Now, obviously Russia and everybody else are going to make a move with these feckless academics at the helm again, but hiring Victoria Nuland back in is a direct threat of continued NATO expansion. I personally think the Kremlin strategy is dumb and an obvious case of massive war crimes, but it's the Biden admintration that stupidly spurred them to lurch like this in an uncontrolled fashion. Victoria Nuland shouldn't even be allowed to serve in public office, to put it nicely.

>>2256
imagine believing russia was mad about some used up old whore

>>2352

I do not get it are saying V.N. is a used up old whore?

>>2353
I don't think that woman is important enough politically to provoke anything from Russia

Americans say that they want to live in a police state today because there is a slight chance the temperature might rise 1000 years from now.