-  [WT]  [PS]  [Home] [Manage]

[Return]
Posting mode: Reply
  1.   (reply to 1)
  2. (for post and file deletion)
/civ/ - Civics
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG, WEBM
  • Maximum file size allowed is 1000 KB.
  • Images greater than 200x200 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Currently 971 unique user posts. View catalog

  • Blotter updated: 2018-08-24 Show/Hide Show All

Movies & TV 24/7 via Channel7: Web Player, .m3u file. Music via Radio7: Web Player, .m3u file.


Anonymous 16/11/10(Thu)02:35 No. 1 ID: 132ea3 Stickied
1

File 14787417401.jpg - (69.55KB , 600x791 , hopeless.jpg )

this is a bad idea


>>
Anonymous 16/11/10(Thu)08:22 No. 2 ID: df6334

>>1
To answer the obvious concern about this turning into /pol/, observe how /rnb/ hasn't completely turned into /r9k/. I have faith that we shall continue to maintain 7chan's distinctive culture through its unique institutions. On a certain level that's what civics itself is about: learning about the ins and outs that make your institutions what they are so you can more fully participate in them with more valuable contributions.


>>
Anonymous 16/11/10(Thu)11:24 No. 3 ID: 991a34

>>2
And at least YouTube embedding isn't enabled.

YouTube is where civil discourse goes to die. In a pit of fire. And pop-tarts.


>>
Anonymous 16/11/10(Thu)16:35 No. 4 ID: 00f04a

>>1
I agree; why wasn't there a /777/ trial period? /trump/ is no longer relevant (unless the admin wants to open a /prez/).

>>2
>observe how /rnb/ hasn't completely turned into /r9k/
The only similarity between the two is their first initial; this is not a sound basis for comparison.

>>3
>YouTube is where civil discourse goes to die
I thought that was Yahoo Answers, where all discourse goes to die.


>>
Anonymous 16/11/11(Fri)02:13 No. 5 ID: 132ea3

/hi/ is supposed to cover cultural stuff anyway, just direct people there

we don't need a dead containment board


>>
Anonymous 16/11/11(Fri)07:44 No. 7 ID: 991a34

>>4
Yahoo is pretty much a wasteland of endlessly repeated conspiracy theories and hopelessly stupid people writing responses to amazingly stupid people's questions (and sometimes all of the above).

I think the idea is that if you want to talk politics or bitch about how big Hillary's vagina is, you come here, and don't clutter up the rest of 7chan with pointless bullshit.


>>
Anonymous 16/11/11(Fri)16:03 No. 8 ID: 9a6676

>>3
mmmmmmmmm agreed
>>7
youre digging your own grave. those people r worse than you know and youre welcoming them in by establishing this board. b wouldn't be covered in pol shit if youd do your fucking job and bam the samefag who shitposts "current events", replys to every post with a youtube link, and has literally 0 relevant content ever.


>>
Anonymous 16/11/12(Sat)03:21 No. 9 ID: 783412

>>9

Is this a joke? a ruse?


>>
Anonymous 16/11/12(Sat)03:45 No. 10 ID: dfa396

>>8
They do, but he keeps coming back, and mods aren't on 24/7.


>>
Anonymous 16/11/12(Sat)05:41 No. 11 ID: c1fc44

>>/b/759941
I don't think we really have the problem this board is intended to solve. I've never felt that /b/ was overwhelmingly flooded with political threads. Furthermore, given the generally strawberried nature of political discussions on 7chan, /b/ is a much more appropriate place for such pissing contests.

inb4 /civ/ is only ever used to discuss the pointlessness of /civ/


>>
Anonymous 16/11/12(Sat)08:55 No. 12 ID: df6334

>>11
If it's used only for that, it's still a good thing. You wouldn't want complaints about /civ/ shitting up the other boards.


>>
Anonymous 16/11/13(Sun)06:07 No. 16 ID: 7676eb

>>11
I agree.

Make b great again!

And by great, I mean unrestricted.


>>
Anonymous 16/11/14(Mon)06:11 No. 23 ID: 780ad0

>>16
/b/ was never great


>>
Anonymous 16/11/16(Wed)05:36 No. 31 ID: df6334

>>23
/b/ was never good, but moments of greatness can seem to poke through to the impressionable minds that feel as though they're connecting with strangers around the world and rebelling against their mundane meatspace reality.


>>
Anonymous 16/11/18(Fri)07:40 No. 39 ID: b67aaa

>>/b/759941
Thing is, it's impossible to clealy distinguish what does an does not constitute a "political" discussion.


>>
Anonymous 16/11/18(Fri)17:28 No. 41 ID: a65856
41

File 147948648940.jpg - (24.09KB , 600x451 , consider.jpg )

You could just make a /pol/ and keep it. They're very successful boards on other chans.


>>
Anonymous 16/12/09(Fri)16:27 No. 67 ID: c6048b

I'll admit I didn't put much effort into this one:
>>/banner/1301

By the way, when do we get a new /777/? After the inauguration?


>>
Anonymous 16/12/20(Tue)02:19 No. 83 ID: 1b2188

>>67

based on past patterns, probably in about a year


>>
Anonymous 16/12/20(Tue)02:22 No. 84 ID: 75c683

>>41
Yeah but they also A: Get infested with right wingers and then B: Because of sed infestation of right wing trolls and imbiciles Left wingers split off and demand their own pol.

Then you end up with two echo chambers.
Look at what happened to 8ch.

Pol is literally Nazis and leftpol is literally Commies.


>>
Anonymous 16/12/20(Tue)03:09 No. 85 ID: 9b5a71

>>84
This isn't 8ch. This is 7chan, where the mods will ban you because it's funny. If anyone cries about how their favorite mass murderer isn't loved enough then they can eat shit.


>>
Anonymous 16/12/20(Tue)03:15 No. 86 ID: 75c683

>>85
Gotta admit, you make a strong argument.


>>
Anonymous 17/01/06(Fri)01:14 No. 143 ID: 5719d7

I mean I'm all for new boards, but shouldn't you be allowed to post whatever you want in /b/ anyways? I just don't understand how Random can mean Measured Discussion


>>
Anonymous 17/01/06(Fri)17:47 No. 146 ID: 0f99a0

>>143
technically speaking you still can. it's not like there ever was any gurantee that your posts won't be baleted and you wouldn't be banned for any or no reason at all to begin with. at least we've been told what to expect for once; 7chan's mods are not often so generous.


>>
Anonymous 17/05/06(Sat)03:56 No. 283 ID: 87f732
283

File 149403578224.jpg - (260.10KB , 1093x705 , your-place-in-the-universe.jpg )

I'm starting to like it.
>>/banner/1328


>>
Anonymous 19/02/28(Thu)05:05 No. 1263 ID: 1e6636

slowwwwwww


>>
Anonymous 19/03/01(Fri)00:41 No. 1265 ID: 21867a
1265

File 155139726694.jpg - (110.53KB , 800x600 , civic_type_r.jpg )

>>5
he's right. why have yet another containment board when there's nothing to contain? what's with 7chan's obsession of spreading shit so thin when there's barely any shit to spread?


>>
Anonymous 19/03/01(Fri)08:38 No. 1267 ID: a0cb14

>>1265
Nah, this strawberry farm has grown on me.
I think what we need is a new banner campaign!
>>/banner/1349

saging a sticky (/777/)


>>
Anonymous 19/04/15(Mon)14:12 No. 1402 ID: 21867a

>>1267
I just went on /hi/ and it's full of threads that should be in /civ/ or /phi/ instead. If this is an attempt at creating "unique institutions" for the sake of it as per >>2 then it's a classic case of delusional escalation of commitment, aka "I don't need to do anything about it because the community will figure it out themselves like they have in the past amirite guise?"

>I like it
well, good for you m8


>>
Anonymous 19/09/21(Sat)00:39 No. 1694 ID: 3dc826

>>1402
Nobody wants to go on /phi/ because the mentally ill postbot will drag the conversation to atheism or aliens or another pushbutton for his mental illness because those are the only things he'll talk about. Although he won't ever respond directly to you. He'll just make a post and then respond to his own posts over and over.


>>
Anonymous 19/09/24(Tue)11:54 No. 1701 ID: dcc65a

>>1694
This. /phi/ is a wasteland.


>>
Anonymous 20/04/25(Sat)12:28 No. 1825 ID: 252713
1825

File 158781052920.jpg - (351.09KB , 700x525 , 35354554.jpg )

See pic
Pic : Related


>>
Anonymous 20/05/20(Wed)09:02 No. 1832 ID: 7cb4c3

History can be fun!


>>
Anonymous 20/11/06(Fri)09:21 No. 1944 ID: 480add
1944

File 160465089610.jpg - (9.49KB , 225x207 , ad959b46d3ac2e77ab16e62d3c65baa9.jpg )

that's a book about how to castrate a person so I guess you should just avoid it at all costs from this point forward


>>
Anonymous 20/11/10(Tue)04:35 No. 1948 ID: 7cb4c3

>>1944
I thought it was a book about how to be hopeless


>>
Anonymous 21/10/30(Sat)03:37 No. 2120 ID: def6ba

>>1948
You don't need books for that, but I recommend TS Elliott anyway.


>>
Anonymous 21/12/09(Thu)06:21 No. 2167 ID: 7cb4c3

pOlItIcS iS tHe OnLy tOpIc wOrTh dIsCuSsInG


>>
Anonymous 22/04/16(Sat)00:48 No. 2193 ID: 6f8a99

>>2167
moar leik worth disgusing amirite xD


>>
Anonymous 23/11/04(Sat)00:03 No. 2335 ID: 7913a5
2335

File 16990526155.jpg - (59.19KB , 720x690 , JEMA5872.jpg )

I just want to bring back Pogroms


>>
The+Red+Barron 24/01/01(Mon)20:02 No. 2362 ID: 18ef5a

>>2335
they ban you for promoting pedophilia (Leviticus 21; it is confirmed in the Bible as a demand and law to marry children) but they let feds post pictures of children whoring themselves all day


>>
Anonymous 24/09/11(Wed)13:06 No. 2402 ID: 62faf6

Americans used to ridicule the Chinese for being too weak to resist tyranny, but now Americans have found out that they are cowards, too.



[Return] [Entire Thread] [Last 50 posts]



Delete post []
Password  
Report post
Reason