>>
File
174026069046.png
- (178.53KB
, 270x337
, 423b7f41e2420474e55247433538481f.png
)
>>11557
No but "furry images" is a catch-all, and what I'm saying is that 4cucks at least separated the definition of "furry porn" and "furry images" within the last few years. If /fur/ has a more /r9k/ or lounge side that isn't just image dumps, it may be good, but I don't like scrolling through my image collection for 15 seconds longer to find non-furshit. It's not the end of the world, but I wish the rules about furshit were at least more transparent. Like can we post cartoon animals at all?