>>
File
149535652036.jpg
- (503.63KB
, 1290x1080
, 61121384_p2.jpg
)
>>25095
I quoted you word for word from post >>25089 TWICE. You literally said "You don't hold the right to celebrate their deaths solely due to the fact that they have different views than you." That's why I was asking what backwards country they were in where they don't hold the right. Is it that hard to read what you say? Are you too fucking autistic to be able to read your own post? Unless that wasn't you, in which case then why the fuck did you even reply?
>>25096
I have zero problem and completely agree that it's morally wrong. She's gonna lose money and keep losing money from being retarded with her views and whatever's happening with her payment system. Freedom of speech doesn't mean freedom from consequences of retarded speech.
I don't have a problem with sharing paid shit just to spite her or just in general without having a spite reason. I just find it really stupid people like >>25073 pretend their superior than her just because she's sjw insane while they beg and leech for her shit and can't forget they contradict themselves in their very next post. If they really were against it they wouldn't want anyone to pay a dime for her shit to share it or not, but what they really want is to leech and think "haha I'm getting back at this retarded sjw" when they've probably never even paid for shit with their own hard earned money in their life. I mean they could just pay whatever amount for the latest shit and share it here right away instead of waiting while she keeps getting potential sales. Instead they clearly can't buy shit and just beg. They have no ability to look at themselves objectively, only from the viewpoint that they are always right and justified. 0 fucking shame and proceeds to shit up the thread.
If they're gonna beg, they can at least not be pretentious about it and not get mad because they get called out.